Ohio Family Law Blog Contributor Daniel Pollack, professor at Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University in New York City asks if there is legal immunity for social workers who lie in a child custody case.
Tags: Austin v. Borel, California law, child protection, custody, Daniel Pollack, dependency hearing, Doe v. Lebbos, false statements, Gray v. Poole, immunity, lie, prosecution, qualified immunity, Rippy v. Hattaway, Shawn Hooks, social workers, United States Supreme Court, Van Emrik v. Chemung, Yeshiva University
Posted in: Custody Issues | 2 Comments | Trackback | Email This Post
| Print This Post